Resultados de la búsqueda: juan gervas

Medicine and its preventive excesses

18 Dec

With practical examples based on the real impact of medicalization in people lives and on the results from relevant and well designed studies, Juan Gérvas analyses the importance of certain screening programmes as breast cancer, thyroid cancer, the relevance of health check-ups and the impact of certain vaccines. He discusses the examples of Public Health Programs in some countries and its null or negative effect in terms of health indicators and quality of life results.

Social egg freezing (oocyte banking for anticipated gamete exhaustion). Ethical, practical and social problems

18 Sep

This text has two objectives: 1/to draw attention to an important issue in women’s health; and 2/to help train health professionals by providing evidence-based information about and criteria for what is called “social egg freezing.” Why don’t we extract eggs or ovarian tissue from women who are still young and then freeze and store them until they are needed at a later age? At first glance, this may seem to be a kind of preventive measure, one that could achieve “better health of the embryo”, that “buys time” and allows “breathing”, since freezing offers a de facto stopping of the clock. Regression and atresia of eggs are avoided, since frozen eggs remain as they were when initially removed many years earlier.

Unfortunately, however, only the eggs or ovarian tissue fragments remain the same: real time passes for the woman herself, her own body ages, so that if she becomes pregnant at a much later time, more complications are expected in pregnancy, childbirth and the postpartum period. Freezing eggs and ovarian tissue fragments for use in reproduction for social causes raises serious ethical, practical and social issues that require reflection to prevent “normalization” and trivialization and to ensure there is no medical violence against women.

  • Social egg freezing (oocyte banking for anticipated gamete exhaustion). Ethical, practical and social problems. Juan Gérvas and Mercedes Perez-Fernandez. Madrid (Spain) September 2015. Download whole document here.

Organization of Spanish Consumers against “medicalization of daily life”

8 May

Last 25th March, OCU joined and signed “Action on Selling Sickness” during a public action in a press conference. The Organization of Spanish Consumers is a private and independent one.

OCU has translated into Spanish the document, and have started a campaign againts “medicalization of daily life” http://www.ocu.org/salud/medicamentos/informe/demasiados-medicamentos/stampa

Notice the Spanish impact in the call for action” after the OCU action http://sellingsickness.com/final-statement/

The OCU organization was created in 1975; is a non-profit organizationto defend the rights of consumers.

The OCU is not subsidized, but is financed by contributions from its members, currently over 315,000 members. -OCU belongs to “Consumer International” http://www.consumersinternational.org/our-members/member-directory/OCU%20-%20Organisation%20of%20Consumers%20and%20Users%20-%20Organizaci%C3%B3n%20de%20Consumidores%20y%20Usuarios

It is important that consumers associations joint health professionals and health intitutions. See its 3 recommendations for being aware about medicalization and selling sickness. Summary, be aware when:

  1. Speak only of great benefit without mention the risks or alternatives, where they exist (although they have nothing to do with taking pills).
  2. Exaggerate the dangers of a health problem or even a risk factor to the point of generating large dose of insecurity and alarm.
  3. Behind campaign, web, advertisement or any other form of communication that seeks to “inform” about a disease or health problem, is a company that can thereby obtain a direct economic benefit.

Vaccines, health and life

8 Jan

There is a debate on vaccines. There is agreement on the advantages of some of them have for the individual and for the population, like the poliomyelitis, and there is great disagreement on others, like the vaccine against the human papilloma virus or the flu. In any case, vaccines should be a voluntary practice because as any medication they always mix benefits and harms.

 

http://elproyectomatriz.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/vaccines-health-and-life-by-juan-gervas-2012.pdf

Quaternary prevention: theory and practice

13 Oct

All health services have adverse effects, all health services might produce damage to health. A few services produce more benefits than harms in specific situations. Unnecessary and inappropriate services mainly produce harms, and few benefits if any. Quaternary prevention is the prevention of unnecessary and/or inappropriate services and the prevention of over-medicalisation. Quaternary prevention refers mainly to personal services, to clinical care, but collective services is not out of scope. The topic of the 2011 Seminar of Innovation in Primary Care was quaternary prevention. We included the speakers abstracts and the summary of the face-to-face encounter.

  • Prevención cuaternaria: teoría y práctica en la consulta, la enseñanza y la política sanitaria, y su relación con la equidad y el coste. Gérvas, J. Barcelona, octubre 2011. Descargar resumen aquí.

Flu vaccine 2011-2012, a terminator vaccine. More reason to say a reasonable “no” by professionals and patients

21 Sep

Year after year we have heard about the need of a new flu vaccine shot because the virus mutations. But this season, 2011-2012, the flu vaccine is exactly the same of the previous one, 2010-2011. Now the reason is that the immunity lasts one year. It is a “terminator” vaccine, as the sterile seeds you must buy for every crop. The text is devoted to this topic.

  • Flu vaccine 2011-2012, a terminator vaccine. More reason to say a reasonable “no” by professionals and patients. Gérvas, J. Madrid (Spain). September 2011. Download English version here

What role for primary health care in modern health service provision? Seminar of Innovation in Primary Care. Oxford (UK), 29nd September 2012

20 Sep

Rethinking the health service production function: What role for primary health care in modern health service provision?

Seminar of Innovation in Primary Care. Oxford (UK), 29nd September 2012

Organized by Juan Gérvas MD, PhD (general practitioner, Equipo CESCA, Madrid, Spain; visiting professor, International Health, National School of Public Health, Madrid) and José M. Valderas MD, PhD (Professor, Department of Primary Care, Oxford, United Kingdom).

Health policy-making is by definition concerned with selecting health interventions between different alternatives. Evidence exist that some of those interventions have to be inter-sectoral actions, prompting other sectors to “do something good for health”, such as increasing tobacco taxes in order to reduce smoking. However, the bulk of the actions promoted by most health policies are (hopefully cost-effective) health services in response to well assessed health needs. There are very many types of services, defined in many different ways (e.g. laboratory services, nursing services, emergency services).

When defining those services we prescribe the use of well defined inputs in the expectation to produce some precise outputs and outcomes. For example, without narcotic analgesics and skilled primary care professionals it will extremely difficult to take care of terminal patients at home. Having both, however, is not sufficient guarantee that the above mentioned outputs and outcomes will be optimum. A number of important issues emerge therefore: what is the best mix of skills?, for example; or how to offer continuity of care for these patients (and relatives) during out-of-working schedule?; or, what is the role of palliative teams, and in general that of the hospital?; etc.

The answers to those questions have been the body of intense debate for decades, and they have remained reasonably stable. We now need to think about health systems, however, as organizations which offer services in a changing world, with changing technologies and therefore changing boundaries regarding the “best location” for the services, with private and public stakeholders wanting to participate in what has become a phenomenally important economic activity, strong resistance to change by many who fear that change may mean the end on long-cherished privileges, and so on and so forth.

In other words, there is a need to answer (again!) a number of critical questions that will determine the way health care will be delivered in the coming decades, such as:

  1. who, where and when should take care of whom, suffering from which diseases-problems and under which circumstances?
  2. what is the “right” location for each type of care?
  3. who is expected to do what in each particular moment in order to improve the situation in the most efficient way?
  4. how to set up in each period the (unavoidably fluid) “boundaries” to be articulated in the process of care?

and indeed many others.

I would like to suggest the document about “What role for primary  health care in modern health service provision?” for launching the debate that should lead us to the seminar proposed for the Autumn of 2012. The paper is the product of a number of reflections by me, Juan Gervas, with open discussions for a number of months with Antonio Durán and Barbara Starfield, unfortunately interrupted by Barbara’s death. It is not certainly not presented as any kind of dogma but rather as a sincere review of what used to be solid certainties and now are openly challengeable convictions, open to criticism. An ongoing on-line debate is also expected to take place along the tradition of our seminars, ending with a paper to be published in a peer-review journal after the face-to-face meeting.

Inscription for the seminar will be free but request is needed to Juan Gérvas (jgervasc@meditex.es as well as mpf1945@gmail.com) and to Raimundo Pastor (rpastors@meditex.es).

Thanks to you all.